In the
speeches “Noble Lecture” by Toni Morrison and “This is Water” by David Foster
Wallace, both explain how everyone has choices to make and depending on what
choice you make the outcome will differ. In the speech “Noble Lecture” Toni
Morrison states, “Whether it is to stay alive, it is your decisions in your
responsibility.” It is up to us as individuals and leaders to decide what we
want to do with the language we are given. If we want to slander and abandon
our language, that is up to us but we can also be proud of the language we are
born with and use it to better the world.
In “This is Water” Wallace talks about how it is our choice if we want
to change our look on the world and our attitude. “It means being conscious and
aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you
construct meaning from your experience.” If we choose to look at the world in a
different way, in a way where we are not always the center of attention we will
live a less stressful, happier life. Both author explain that the choice is up
to us on how we wish to live our daily lives and how we go about our routines.
If we were to not wanting to change our views on how we live we will slowly die
inside of ourselves and become miserable. “How to keep from going through your
comfortable, prosperous, respectable adult life dead, unconscious, a slave to
your head…”
Although there are similarities
between the two speeches, there are also differences. Toni Morrison is talking
about how language is important and shapes who we are as a person. “it makes
meaning that secures our differences, our human differences- the way in which
we are like no other life.” The language we are born with, we decide what we
get to do with it, however our language will always define who we are as a
person. David Wallace’s speech is different than Toni Morrison’s because he is
giving us a choice on how to change our attitudes and out look on the world,
not a choice of language but a choice of how we view life in our heads. “This
is not a matter of virtue- it’s a matter of my choosing to do the work of
somehow altering or getting free of my natural, hard-wired default-setting,
which is to be deeply and literally self-centered, and to see and interpret
everything though this lens of self.”
I think you' re absolutely correct with your analysis of "This is Water," but I have a bit of an altered opinion over what Morrsion's Nobel Lecture implied. I understood that it meant less about our identity and more that we could nurture language however we choose. We can use language to better the human condition or to destruct the human condition depending on a person's actions. It doesn't seem to imply that it's about pride as much as, like you said, how and what we do with language. At the end, when the wise, old woman explained that the non-existant bird is what they (her and the young group) made: language / understanding.
ReplyDelete